Structural Functionalism vs Conflict Theory

Structural functionalism and battle speculation have some diametrical points of view. One of them is that structural functionalism sees confederation as a complex system, that permit it to move cohesively, and looks society as a macro-level orientation course tour the conflict theory focuses on the companionable system that lonesome(prenominal) movement for a select few of society and is known because the struggle for dominance among fond groups that compete for scarce resources. Knowing this, How polar structural functionalism views sexuality than conflict theory does in a society? sexual activity differences ar viewed from functionalism as an efficient panache to create divisions and specializing of cooperative labour into peculiar(prenominal)ally circumscribed tasks and roles. Also, it is viewed as a social system where particulars segments be responsible for specific labor acts.These division of labor are very efficient because create a maximum use of resources. This theory has been criticized for reifying sexual activity roles. In functionalist perspective gender roles throw to social relations.Conflict theory has a different look of gender. In this theory gender is viewed as an attempt from male to restrain power and privilege over female, and males are seen as the dominant group while females are seen as the subordinate group. The only reason why gender roles unruffled exist is because to maintain their power and attitude the dominant group is still workings for that.There exist some difference intimately how this two theories, functionalist and conflict perspective sees gender and what is the importance in society. In my private opinion Im more with the idea that functionalism have with gender.